Re: For Monday

Jeremiah Foster <jeremiah.foster@...>

On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@...> wrote:
To all,

Here are interesting "Model Trademark Guidelines" for free/libre/open projects:

To Jeremiah,

If you wish to discuss, please review the information provided prior
to popping off a dismissive retort.

Oh the lulz!
Here's something else from OSI for your thoughtful consideration:
Also, here you can read about the Python Trademark dispute:

Meh. I prefer the recent discussion by FSF and the Free Software Conservancy:

The approach to trademark described there is similar to the Free Software process itself, liberal and generous. If people say they're using Open Chain's process and they're able to achieve compliance then that is the right outcome. Its highly unlikely that anyone careful enough to follow the process would violate knowingly the Open Chain trademark. 



Joseph Potvin
Operations Manager | Gestionnaire des opérations
The Opman Company | La compagnie Opman
Mobile: 819-593-5983

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Jeremiah Foster
<jeremiah.foster@...> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@...> wrote:
>> Jeremiah,
>> Please see the OSI's Trademark Usage Guidelines:
>> You might also find the OSI-vs-OSHWA tussel about logos interesting:
>> ...this got resolved as follows:
>> You could try to convince people like Richard Fontana, Lawrence Lessig,
>> Eben Moglen, and Mark Radcliffe that trademarks signifying compliance are
>> "legalistic nonsense" in the free/libre/open realm.
> I think they'd agree already. You're not going to sue anyone over trademark
> infringement on a project designed to help someone achieve compliance with
> the GPL. That's just silly.
> Cheers,
> Jeremiah
OpenChain mailing list

Jeremiah C. Foster

Pelagicore AB
Ekelundsgatan 4, 6tr, SE-411 18
Gothenburg, Sweden
M: +46 (0)73 093 0506

Join to automatically receive all group messages.