Re: OSADL demo for consideration of certification prototype -- OpenChain agenda 12/7


RUFFIN, MICHEL (MICHEL) <michel.ruffin@...>
 

Jim,
I am sorry not being able to participate more to Openchain discussions, I really think it is important but at the moment I am involved in the integration between Alcatel-Lucent and Nokia (on FOSS issues 8-)) and this is taking a lot of my bandwidth.

Anyway I am available to answer dedicated questions and will try in the future to participate to Openchain more.

My point of view is that the questions sent to companies should be more on

"an issue, how do you solve the issue", not on "proposing a solution and how you comply with this solution".

Second point is not attaching documents, I have no time to write special documents for OpenChain and the ALU process is are around 140 pages of text and mixed sometimes with confidential information, so replace it with free text

We will need more discussion on this and I am happy to help. it is in the interest of ALU and Nokia that Openchain is successful and so far I have a white blanket to participate from ALU and Nokia.

Michel
Michel.Ruffin@..., PhD
Software Coordination Manager, COO - B&ITT
Distinguished Member of Technical Staff
Tel +33 6 75 25 21 94
Alcatel-Lucent International, Centre de Villarceaux - France

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Jim Hutchison [mailto:hutch@...]
Envoyé : vendredi 18 décembre 2015 19:40
À : RUFFIN, MICHEL (MICHEL)
Cc : openchain@...
Objet : RE: OSADL demo for consideration of certification prototype -- [OpenChain] OpenChain agenda 12/7

Hi Michel,

These are helpful observations, as we are looking for a solution folks would want to use productively.
In considering OpenChain, we should be able to steer clear of contract/agreement terms. This will be good to keep an eye on as we proceed in formulating the certification questions.

The group discussion appears to be trending towards using such an on-line mechanism, and with text crafted from the OpenChain text. Ideally we will make the questions flexible to many business processes, while retaining inquiry to illuminate adherence to the core concerns.

Thanks,

Jim Hutchison
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.

At 02:04 AM 12/10/2015, RUFFIN, MICHEL (MICHEL) wrote:
Jim, I look at the questionnaire
1) the question are not formulated very clearly and are not always
applying to Alcatel-Lucent, because we use different solutions that the
one represented in the questionnaire
2) the questionnaire is asking to link documents on our process. We
consider our process as a competitive advantage and cannot disclose the
details like this and second there is confidential information in it on
the way we interprete licenses, the deal we have with some foss
suppliers to interprete their license differently or on our patent, so
I cannot link documents

Michel
Michel.Ruffin@..., PhD
Software Coordination Manager, COO - B&ITT Distinguished Member of
Technical Staff Tel +33 6 75 25 21 94 Alcatel-Lucent International,
Centre de Villarceaux - France

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Jim Hutchison [mailto:hutch@...] Envoyé : jeudi 10
décembre 2015 01:18 À : RUFFIN, MICHEL (MICHEL); RUFFIN, MICHEL
(MICHEL) Objet : OSADL demo for consideration of certification
prototype -- [OpenChain] OpenChain agenda 12/7

Hi Michel,

In our last OpenChain meeting, OSADL shared this prototype with the working group. You might find it interesting, as a representation of current thinking of how we might collect certification data.

https://www.foss-slca.org
User name: openchain
Password: buE93oaCw

If you don't submit at the end, Till assured us they would receive no data. Also they would not be worried by test/hypothetical data you might enter in trying out their prototype.

Regards,

Jim Hutchison

Join main@lists.openchainproject.org to automatically receive all group messages.