Back to this old issue that seems to be still present. I created an Excel file that should have correct reference numbers now. It is uploaded to the GH issue that Gary created. 

Thanks Gary. I will get the fix underway :)

> On Feb 4, 2022, at 13:16, Gary O'Neall <gary@...> wrote:
>
> I added an issue in the questionnaire repo to track this: https://github.com/OpenChain-Project/conformance-questionnaire/issues/70
>
> 
>
> Gary
>
> 
>
> From: Gary O'Neall <gary@...>
> Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 8:07 PM
> To: 'main@...' <main@...>
> Subject: RE: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification
>
> 
>
> Hi Jari,
>
> 
>
> Thanks for the additional information.  I don’t believe anyone is working on this issue.
>
> 
>
> The PDF is generated from the data in the conformance-questionnaire github repo.
>
> 
>
> All of the translations would need to be updated with the correct numbers.
>
> 
>
> If you or anyone on the list is comfortable with creating a pull request with the corrected numbers, I can review and merge which will automatically update the PDF.
>
> 
>
> Regards,
> Gary
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto
> Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 9:36 AM
> To: OpenChain Main <main@...>
> Subject: Re: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification
>
> 
>
> Gary et al
>
> 
>
> 
>
> So, in the Conformance in Questions (https://openchain-project.github.io/conformance-questionnaire/questionnaire.pdf), there is Spec Ref column and in that column, the references are pointing to OpenChain specification ver. 2.0.  For 2.1, which is the current ISO standard, the numbering has changed.
>
> 
>
> Attached is an Excel sheet that I just put some examples of the 2.0 -> 2.1 numbering changes. As I mentioned at the moment the questionnaire uses 2.0 numbering not 2.1 and IMHO we should use the latest 2.1 specification version, which is the ISO 5230 standard.
>
> 
>
> BR,
>
> 
>
>    Jari
>
>
> ---
> Jari Koivisto
> E-mail: jari.p.koivisto@...
> Mobile: +41 78 7479791
> Skype: jari.p.koivisto
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jarikoivisto
>
> 
>
> 
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:09 PM Gary O'Neall <gary@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Jari,
>
> 
>
> Can you provide more specifics on where the inconsistency is?  I just looked at the PDF in the link below it has the following text in the header:
>
> 
>
> This document contains a series of questions to determine whether a company has an OpenChain Conformant program. If each of these questions can be answered with a "yes" then that company meets all the requirements of conformance to the OpenChain Specification version 2.1 (functionally identical to ISO/IEC DIS 5230:2020(e)). If any of the questions are answered with a "no" then the company can clearly identify where additional investment is needed to improve the compliance process.
>
> 
>
> It could be an issue in one of the translations if you are looking at a language other than English.
>
> 
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gary
>
> 
>
> From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto
> Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 2:33 AM
> To: OpenChain Main <main@...>
> Subject: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification
>
> 
>
> Hi All,
>
> 
>
> I just noticed that the printable version of self-certification document (https://openchain-project.github.io/conformance-questionnaire/questionnaire.pdf) has Spec Refs to the OpenChain Spec 2.0 version and not the latest 2.1 (ISO 5230) version.
>
> 
>
> Is someone working on this already?
>
> 
>
> BR,
>
> 
>
>    Jari
>
>
> ---
> Jari Koivisto
> E-mail: jari.p.koivisto@...
> Mobile: +41 78 7479791
> Skype: jari.p.koivisto
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jarikoivisto
>
>
>