nico-san、Martin-san、

Thank you for pointing out the error in the FAQ.
We have checked it and found that Yes/No was inconsistent as you pointed out.
We are currently reviewing the next version, which will be published around the end of next month.
We would like to issue the next version with the corrected points.

I hope this FAQ will be useful for you.

Best regards,

yoshiko ohuchi

-----Original Message-----
From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Martin Yagi
Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 7:07 PM
To: main@...
Cc: OpenChain Japan <japan-wg@...>; japan-sg-faq@...
Subject: Re: [openchain] Regional Traction: 2,100 Eyes on Japanese FAQ

Dear all,

Thanks for this; it’s a great resource and, I think, some of the points should be incorporated into reference training material/course as it evolves.

Along with the comment about slide 27 from nico that I agree with, I think there is a similar issue with slide 35:

"In the product incorporating this OSS, do I need to worry about license_B?". Headline answer is "no" but for this point it is "yes".

Best regards,

Martin Yagi
Intellectual Property Manager|


-----Original Message-----
From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Nicolas Toussaint via lists.openchainproject.org
Sent: 09 November 2021 08:57
To: main@...
Cc: OpenChain Japan <japan-wg@...>; japan-sg-faq@...
Subject: Re: [openchain] Regional Traction: 2,100 Eyes on Japanese FAQ

Hi,

That's a great contribution, many thanks to the Japan work group, and Shane for sharing!

I would like to share a remark on slide 27 that got my attention:
The formulations of the top and blue-box questions are formulated in a contradictory way
- Do I need to consider each license when I recognize OSS dependencies?
- [...] can I ignore the licenses of the OSS components [...]

So the answer NO applies to the second, but I guess YES should be applied to the first question ?

nico

--

Nicolas Toussaint - Open Source Expert
OBS - Orange Business Services - Lyon, France
Tel: +33 608 763 559

On 09/11/2021 08:08, Shane Coughlan wrote:
> Some very cool news from the Japan work group.
>
> The FAQ sub-group chaired by Ouchi San has released a version of their
> FAQ in English 👍
>
> And since we last spoke a week ago the Japanese FAQ has been
> downloaded another 500 times. 🎉
>
> The English version:
> https://github.com/OpenChain-Project/OpenChain-JWG/blob/master/Educati
> on_Material/FAQ/Misunderstandings_of_OSS_licenses_CC0.pptx
>
> Japanese:
> https://github.com/OpenChain-Project/OpenChain-JWG/blob/master/Educati
> on_Material/FAQ/OSS%E3%83%A9%E3%82%A4%E3%82%BB%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B9%E9%96
> %A2%E9%80%A3%E3%81%A7%E3%82%88%E3%81%8F%E3%81%82%E3%82%8B%E8%AA%A4%E8%
> A7%A3_CC0.pptx
>
>> On Nov 2, 2021, at 19:12, Shane Coughlan via lists.openchainproject.org <scoughlan=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
>>
>> The OpenChain Project often highlights global news. However, it is important to remember that the majority of activity is truly distributed around the world, especially in our local China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, India, Germany, UK and US work groups. Today we are taking a moment to shine a spotlight on a specific example in Japan.
>> The OpenChain Japan Work Group operates seven sub-groups, one of which is focused on providing answers to frequently asked questions, chaired by Ouchi San from Fujitsu. The FAQ document produced by the group has been downloaded over 2,100 times so far, demonstrating the extent of information dissemination in a specific geography.
>>
>> If you have a Japanese office (or you represent a Japanese company), please be aware that the FAQ sub-group meets on the 8th of November at 15:00 JST. All welcome.
>>
>> ・日時：11月8日(月) 15:00〜17:30
>> ・チャタムハウスルールを採用しています。
>> （誰が言ったかは口外禁止、得た情報は自由利用可）
>> ・オンライン会議(Zoom)：
>>　 Zoom のURLはFAQ-SGのSLACKに掲載予定です。
>>　 （Japan WGのSLACKとは異なります）
>>
>> 以下のメーリングリストへご連絡願います。
>>     • https://lists.openchainproject.org/g/japan-sg-faq/messages
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.






[https://firstlightfusion.com/assets/first-light-fusion-square-logo-footer.png]


   First Light Fusion Ltd.
   p: 01865 807 670
   a: Unit 10, Oxford Industrial Park, Mead Road, Yarnton, Kidlington, Oxford, OX5 1QU



This email and any attachments are confidential. Find more legal information here<http://firstlightfusion.com/confidentiality/>.

[https://firstlightfusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/cyberessentials_certification-mark-plus_colour.png]