This podcast with some pillars of the Chinese open source community covers OpenChain thanks to our good friend King at Huawei: https://podcast.chaoss.community/43 From a more general perspective, you

Reminder about upcoming deadlines/dates to be aware of regarding the Open Compliance Summit CFP: • CFP Closes: Friday, October 1 • CFP Notifications: Tuesday, October 19 • Schedule

Backed by many of the world’s largest companies for more than a decade, SPDX formally becomes an internationally recognized ISO/IEC JTC 1 standard during a transformational time for software and

Thanks for highlighting these, Shane. I'd gone straight for the OSPOCon filter, which is where I assumed all OpenChain-relevant content would be, so missed all of them. 😊 I'm gonna have to read

SK Telecom, South Korea’s largest wireless carrier, is the first telecommunications operator to adopt OpenChain ISO 5230. This leap forward in governance builds on their long-term mission as a

We have three major talks Open Source Summit in Seattle, kicking off with Open Source and ISO Standards - OpenChain and the Future of Compliance, continuing with our friends at Huawei discussing

OpenChain Webinar #30 – Automation Case Study + Continual Improvement In Compliance Programs Check out the full recording and the slides

Today we are talking about an 'Automation Case Study from September through December 2021' + 'Continual improvement around open source license compliance programs' Join Zoom

Reminder: submit your papers for Open Source Summit Japan / Automotive Linux Summit by September 19th Here are the key dates: • CFP Closes: Sunday, September 19 at 11:59pm PDT • CFP Review:

File this under unmissable. Find out about where Huawei’s leadership is taking the future of OpenHarmony in terms of community and OpenChain ISO 5230 adoption. Plus, learn something new about the

If you want to dive into the full background on the recent discussion regarding compliance program quality and continual improvement, check out the recording of the latest work team

It does appear this mental model can provide an avenue forward. Speculation: if the market(s) dictate various concepts of evolution, we will probably see differentiation by sector regarding preferred

All, context slides at link: https://1drv.ms/p/s!AsXJVqby5kpnkShuUGG9M2Ki9MEc During our last call we had some strong push-back in terms of the project itself defining levels of competence. However,

All, context slides at link: https://1drv.ms/p/s!AsXJVqby5kpnkShuUGG9M2Ki9MEc Jari, I think it’s a good idea, but I also fear it might add a little too much complexity at this time. How about we

In a break from our usual governance-related discussions, Linux has hit a big milestone and Greg KH has a few words to share in an interview on the topic. Those who know Greg will know that he is one

Hello all This is a great discussion. I do like Jacob's suggestion with some simple notation that indicates that the "levels" or whatever you call them are cumulative going from the base (Level 1 up

I agree with Steve’s sentiment of wandering tokens, in my opinion levels of assurance with progressive technology independent criteria are required. Borrowing from other ISO standards, I propose

Hi All, I think that this new slide 10 is better now. It might add unnecessary complexity, but maybe each of the 4 arrows could have a small loop arrow on top depicting the nature of iterative work

Thanks Steve. Slide 10 has been refined to place emphasis on the actions being non-normative evolution on the part of a single example

Thanks Matija. Glad it reads well to you! Regards Shane