Apologies for the confusion. The call tomorrow will still be 8am PT. The proposed time change to 9am PT is forTuesday 10/21. Mike Dolan will send an updated meeting invite.

Can we get clarity on the time? I have been told that it is 8 am.

That works for me. Jack Manbeck Texas Instruments

The new time is fine for me. Joseph Potvin Chair, OSI Management Education Working Group Coordinator, The FLOW Syllabus

That works for me. In fact, that time works better for me generally, as I have a standing meeting that conflicts with the current time for the OpenChain callsJ Thanks for coordinating, Jilayne

I have a conflict at 9 am.

Hi, We would like to accommodate a guest speaker on Tues, 10/21. Would it be okay for folks if we move the meeting to 9amPT, 12pm ET, 4pm UTC, 6pm CEST? Thanks, Kelly

Hi Everyone, Reminder our next meeting will be Tuesday, October 7th at 8am PT, 11am ET, 3pm UTC, 5pm CEST. Topics for 10/7 · Continue discussion on acceptance criteria (Yixiong

Thanks, Mark. I will add this to the agenda.

More about the Facebook/Google initiative: http://www.wired.com/2014/09/medieval-style-guilds-will-remake-tech-behind-facebook-google/ Please consider the environment before printing this email. The

We can discuss ISO 19600 and continue discussion on Acceptance Criteria at our next meeting on 10/7. Regards, Kelly

RE: "Hi, our next meeting is on Tuesday 9/16 at 8am PT, 11am ET, 3pm UTC, 5pm CEST" Very sorry -- I read the info incorrectly when I made my e-calendar note, and thus registered it as being at 3 PM

Attached is the slide deck for tomorrow’s discussion. Phone bridge info: Conference Number: +1 (415) 906-5657 Pin: 88326 UberConference URL: http://uberconference.com/mdolan For

Thanks Joseph, I think that would be great. Will try to review the suggested ISO materials prior to the call. BTW nice collection of general FOSS materials on that wiki page. On Sep 13, 2014, at

David, I'm not sure of by "lead an overview discussion" you mean that someone would give a 5-min intro presentation. If suitable I can explain the rationale for my recommendation to situate the

Hi, our next meeting is on Tuesday 9/16 at 8am PT, 11am ET, 3pm UTC, 5pm CEST. In our last meeting we discussed that training materials would be on the agenda for the next meeting. Additionally,

My first post in this chain here. I’m managing a new Blackduck initiative for the supply chain. I would call attention to the IPC’s PDX standard that is already in used in the electronics

RE: "standards (like ISO 9001, CMMI,…)" & "Quality standards make perfect sense. I think however that spdx itself should stay completely neutral of them" During the past year there has been

Hi Soren, I fully agree that SPDX should stay neutral wrt to quality of the “content”. It is not a matter of the format, it is a matter of the process creating the content. The “creator”

Not at all! My misunderstanding is not due to your pedagogy. :P I think Open Chain might complement SPDX quite well. Version 2.0 does look promising. I think SPDX would benefit greatly from some