|
Re: Hello World!
Hi Peter
Quality standards make perfect sense. I think however that spdx itself should stay completely neutral of them and may merely convey the information which quality standards have been
Hi Peter
Quality standards make perfect sense. I think however that spdx itself should stay completely neutral of them and may merely convey the information which quality standards have been
|
By
Soeren_Rabenstein@...
·
#25
·
|
|
Re: Hello World!
Hi everyone,
Thank you for bringing this up. Having this clarified is vital for the open chain activities. Let me add one more aspect. As Mark pointed out, SPDX is a format (like, say, XML). There
Hi everyone,
Thank you for bringing this up. Having this clarified is vital for the open chain activities. Let me add one more aspect. As Mark pointed out, SPDX is a format (like, say, XML). There
|
By
Claus-Peter Wiedemann
·
#24
·
|
|
Updated Invitation: OpenChain Working Group (First and Third Tuesday each month) @ Monthly from 11am to 12pm on the third Tuesday from Tue Sep 16 to Tue Dec 19, 2017 (Michael Dolan)
This event has been changed.
more details »
OpenChain Working Group (First and Third Tuesday each month)
Audio portion:
Conference Number: +1 (415) 906-5657 Pin: 88326
UberConference URL:
This event has been changed.
more details »
OpenChain Working Group (First and Third Tuesday each month)
Audio portion:
Conference Number: +1 (415) 906-5657 Pin: 88326
UberConference URL:
|
By
mdolan@linuxfoundation.org <mdolan@...>
·
#23
·
|
|
OpenChain Meeting Schedule and Invites
Hi everyone, I just sent out invites to the mailing list for the OpenChain Working Group. Having worked on various projects with large groups from many companies, I am aware there are significant
Hi everyone, I just sent out invites to the mailing list for the OpenChain Working Group. Having worked on various projects with large groups from many companies, I am aware there are significant
|
By
Mike Dolan <mdolan@...>
·
#22
·
|
|
Invitation: OpenChain Working Group (First and Third Tuesday of each ... @ Monthly from 11am to 12pm on the first Tuesday from Tue Oct 7 to Tue Dec 5, 2017 (Michael Dolan)
more details »
OpenChain Working Group (First and Third Tuesday of each Month)
Audio portion:
Conference Number: +1 (415) 906-5657 Pin: 88326
UberConference URL:
more details »
OpenChain Working Group (First and Third Tuesday of each Month)
Audio portion:
Conference Number: +1 (415) 906-5657 Pin: 88326
UberConference URL:
|
By
Michael Dolan <mdolan@...>
·
#21
·
|
|
Invitation: OpenChain Working Group (First and Third Tuesday each month) @ Monthly from 10am to 11am on the third Tuesday from Tue Sep 16 to Tue Dec 19, 2017 (Michael Dolan)
more details »
OpenChain Working Group (First and Third Tuesday each month)
Audio portion:
Conference Number: +1 (415) 906-5657 Pin: 88326
UberConference URL: http://uberconference.com/mdolan
For
more details »
OpenChain Working Group (First and Third Tuesday each month)
Audio portion:
Conference Number: +1 (415) 906-5657 Pin: 88326
UberConference URL: http://uberconference.com/mdolan
For
|
By
Michael Dolan <mdolan@...>
·
#20
·
|
|
Canceled Event: OpenChain Workgroup Weekly Meeting @ Weekly from 11am to 12pm on Tuesday from Tue Aug 26 to Tue Dec 16 (Michael Dolan)
This event has been canceled and removed from your calendar.
OpenChain Workgroup Weekly Meeting
Audio portion:
Conference Number: +1 (415) 906-5657 Pin: 88326
UberConference URL:
This event has been canceled and removed from your calendar.
OpenChain Workgroup Weekly Meeting
Audio portion:
Conference Number: +1 (415) 906-5657 Pin: 88326
UberConference URL:
|
By
mdolan@linuxfoundation.org <mdolan@...>
·
#19
·
|
|
No OpenChain call today
Hi everyone, I meant to set up the meeting invite for bi-weekly calls but accidentally setup weekly calls. We will not be meeting today and will resume calls on the first and third Tuesday of every
Hi everyone, I meant to set up the meeting invite for bi-weekly calls but accidentally setup weekly calls. We will not be meeting today and will resume calls on the first and third Tuesday of every
|
By
Mike Dolan <mdolan@...>
·
#16
·
|
|
Canceled Event: OpenChain Workgroup Weekly Meeting @ Tue Sep 2, 2014 11am - 12pm (Michael Dolan)
This event has been canceled and removed from your calendar.
OpenChain Workgroup Weekly Meeting
Audio portion:
Conference Number: +1 (415) 906-5657 Pin: 88326
UberConference URL:
This event has been canceled and removed from your calendar.
OpenChain Workgroup Weekly Meeting
Audio portion:
Conference Number: +1 (415) 906-5657 Pin: 88326
UberConference URL:
|
By
mdolan@linuxfoundation.org <mdolan@...>
·
#15
·
|
|
Re: Every other week
There seems to be support for every other week, with one request we do it on the first and third Tuesdays each month, but skipping next week due to close-of-summer vacations.
Mike, would you mind
There seems to be support for every other week, with one request we do it on the first and third Tuesdays each month, but skipping next week due to close-of-summer vacations.
Mike, would you mind
|
By
Dave Marr
·
#14
·
|
|
Re: Hello World!
Thanks for raising the question, Jeremiah, and to Mark for providing the excellent clarification – both to the benefit of all!
Jilayne
Thanks for raising the question, Jeremiah, and to Mark for providing the excellent clarification – both to the benefit of all!
Jilayne
|
By
Jilayne Lovejoy <Jilayne.Lovejoy@...>
·
#13
·
|
|
Re: Every other week
I also support meeting bi-weekly instead of weekly.
Best,
Eileen
Eileen Evans
Vice President & Deputy General Counsel, Cloud & Open Source
Hewlett-Packard Company
Mobile:
I also support meeting bi-weekly instead of weekly.
Best,
Eileen
Eileen Evans
Vice President & Deputy General Counsel, Cloud & Open Source
Hewlett-Packard Company
Mobile:
|
By
Evans, Eileen <eileen.evans@...>
·
#12
·
|
|
Re: Every other week
I'd agree that every other week is a good idea.
Perhaps for the schedule of topics, we might take your list of sub-components and flesh out what they mean, what kinds of materials or information is
I'd agree that every other week is a good idea.
Perhaps for the schedule of topics, we might take your list of sub-components and flesh out what they mean, what kinds of materials or information is
|
By
Jilayne Lovejoy <Jilayne.Lovejoy@...>
·
#11
·
|
|
Every other week
Based on feedback rec'd offline (time commitment; also some specific folks who are out next week as they extend their US holiday week) it was suggested we move our OpenChain calls to every other week.
Based on feedback rec'd offline (time commitment; also some specific folks who are out next week as they extend their US holiday week) it was suggested we move our OpenChain calls to every other week.
|
By
Dave Marr
·
#10
·
|
|
Re: Hello World!
Hey Jeremiah,
It’s been a while. Forgive me for doing a lousy job educating you on SPDX. Thanks, MarkG for filling in.
Having been involved in SPDX from the outset, I can tell you that there are
Hey Jeremiah,
It’s been a while. Forgive me for doing a lousy job educating you on SPDX. Thanks, MarkG for filling in.
Having been involved in SPDX from the outset, I can tell you that there are
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#9
·
|
|
Re: Hello World!
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Gisi, Mark <Mark.Gisi@...> wrote:
Jeremiah raised some common concerns about SPDX that, as an early adopter, I wanted to share my experiences.
>> while SPDX looks
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Gisi, Mark <Mark.Gisi@...> wrote:
Jeremiah raised some common concerns about SPDX that, as an early adopter, I wanted to share my experiences.
>> while SPDX looks
|
By
Jeremiah Foster <jeremiah.foster@...>
·
#8
·
|
|
Re: Hello World!
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Marr, David <dmarr@...> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 28, 2014, at 1:39 AM, Jeremiah Foster <jeremiah.foster@...> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Firstly, and most importantly, I'd
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Marr, David <dmarr@...> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 28, 2014, at 1:39 AM, Jeremiah Foster <jeremiah.foster@...> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Firstly, and most importantly, I'd
|
By
Jeremiah Foster <jeremiah.foster@...>
·
#7
·
|
|
Re: Hello World!
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Gisi, Mark <Mark.Gisi@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Jeremiah,
>
>
>
> >>> Secondly, I have some concern around cadence.
>
>
>
> I am ok with either a weekly or biweekly
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Gisi, Mark <Mark.Gisi@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Jeremiah,
>
>
>
> >>> Secondly, I have some concern around cadence.
>
>
>
> I am ok with either a weekly or biweekly
|
By
Jeremiah Foster <jeremiah.foster@...>
·
#6
·
|
|
Re: Hello World!
Jeremiah raised some common concerns about SPDX that, as an early adopter, I wanted to share my experiences.
>> while SPDX looks great, its not widely adopted. Debian has its own format and Yocto
Jeremiah raised some common concerns about SPDX that, as an early adopter, I wanted to share my experiences.
>> while SPDX looks great, its not widely adopted. Debian has its own format and Yocto
|
By
Mark Gisi
·
#5
·
|
|
Re: Hello World!
HiJeremiah,
>>> Secondly, I have some concern around cadence.
I am ok with either a weekly or biweekly cadence.
>>> Lastly, I'd strongly urge all of us to kill our darlings. We need to not
HiJeremiah,
>>> Secondly, I have some concern around cadence.
I am ok with either a weekly or biweekly cadence.
>>> Lastly, I'd strongly urge all of us to kill our darlings. We need to not
|
By
Mark Gisi
·
#3
·
|