To all, Here are interesting "Model Trademark Guidelines" for free/libre/open projects: http://modeltrademarkguidelines.org/index.php?title=Home:_Model_Trademark_Guidelines To Jeremiah, If you wish

Oh the lulz! Meh. I prefer the recent discussion by FSF and the Free Software Conservancy: https://www.fsf.org/news/canonical-updated-licensing-terms The approach to trademark described there is

Jeremiah, Joseph, I'm just catching up on this thread, thanks for the responses. Jeremiah, I read the materials at the link you provided re the FSF and SFC discussion with Canonical, which seemed to

You're right of course David. The issue there is really somewhat tangential to Trademark. My take is that one of the tools that Canonical uses to deny other projects reuse of Ubuntu packages is

Hi all, I will not be able to participate in the todays call. So I try the email approach. Regarding the “trademark” discussion my view is in line with Jeremiah as follows: Our goal shall

My comment is mainly addressing the time to set in place a complete governance process in a big company. You need to raise awareness, you need to put resource in place, you need to address all the

It appears that someone in this conversation has been tagged as advocating "some ISO regime that sues people over trademark". Let me correct that. I have in the past, on this list, advocated our

Thanks Jeremiah, I believe I now understand the concern you're raising. Let's discuss on the call today the issue of access versus the perception of exclusivity. Dave

As one of the auditors involved in the OSADL audit I think you do not understand the OSADL license audit approach, why it was developed, what the experience of the auditors has been and what the next

As I can’t make today’s call either, let me add my 2 cents: I see this as very similar to how SOMC has used ISO standards. Some ISO standards we bothered getting certified for (expensive and

https://www.osadl.org/uploads/media/OSADL-Open-Source-License-Compliance-Audit-EN.pdf

This event has been changed. more details » OpenChain Working Group (Third Monday of each month invite) Changed: Just for 8/17, those who are in Seattle for LinuxCon NA will meet between 12-2:20pm

Open Chain: Framework/Processes OSADL: Quality of the result (work product, i.e. operational compliance) Same as: CMMI Quality assurance Two cups of tea. Not interchangable. Not to be

So for the last 15 mins of the call we thought it was strange that there were no other questions! We dropped and didn't know. Doh. Looking forward to talking with folks at LinuxCon North America,

Hi Sorry for the late answer I was not really able answer earlier Von: RUFFIN, MICHEL (MICHEL) [mailto:michel.ruffin@...] Gesendet: Montag, 20. Juli 2015 14:04 An: Fendt, Oliver; hutch@... Cc:

[Oliver] yes I know to handle 3rd party software (no matter whether OSS of commercial of the shelf) in a correct manner affects the entire company including the Human Resource department because you

Hi Everyone, The meeting minutes are posted at Meeting Materials and Minutes. Let me know if I missed anything or if you have any questions. Looking forward to our next call on Mon, 8/3.

[hutch] To the extent that the application of OpenChain results in acollection of indications of how OpenChain is applied to a participant ina supply chain, these indications (artifacts of

Hi – Here’s the agenda for our next call on Mon, 8/3 at 9am Pacific. • Continue on Etherpad (Team discussion)http://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/openchain • Continue discussion

Thought to send a note to explain that in our last call (before our connection drop) I mentioned that I thought our next meeting was the F2F in Seattle at LinuxCon North America. But I miscalculated