The OpenChain 2.1 Specification (License Compliance) / ISO/IEC 5230:2020 Standard is now available in MarkDown as part of our ongoing effort to make editing and translation of our material

REMINDER: OpenChain Monthly Community Call - 09:00 PST (16:00 UTC) on 1st Tuesday (tomorrow) We will be: Formally announcing Specification Work Group chairperson elections Starting the process for

Cool. Ana, can you help us experiment with the same tool as TODO to make mind maps? :)

I think that mindmaps work for all. The tool TODO group is using is nice text based, so it is easy for GH use. There is a VScode plugin too. Jari

Hi Jari! I noticed TODO Group using MindMaps. No objection to doing a version. What demographic should be targeted? Shane Shane Coughlan OpenChain General Manager +818040358083 Book a

Cool! If there are no objections, I will go live tomorrow, November 1st. Shane Coughlan OpenChain General Manager +818040358083 Book a meeting: https://meetings.hubspot.com/scoughlan

I like it😊 BR J

Looks good to me! steve From:main@... <main@...> on behalf of Shane Coughlan <scoughlan@...> Date: Monday, 31 October 2022 at 08:27 To: OpenChain Main <main@...> Cc: OpenChain Education

The OpenChain Automotive Work Group will host its next meeting as a virtual event on the 11th of November between 16:00-17:00 JST (2022-11-11 07:00 UTC). Everyone is welcome. This event will be an

Hi All, One of the iterations looked quite a lot like a mindmap, which could be one way to describe our organization. But I like the 3 slides Shane sent, but for some forums mindmap could be a working

Hey everyone… we continued to get great ideas about how to described OpenChain work groups around the world. Pulling it all together, here is my suggested release candidate. What do you think?

Hey everyone I am collecting stories about people’s engagement with and adoption plans for the security assurance specification. Partly this is to understand where we are at with the specification

Something like this? On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 10:19 AM Jimmy Ahlberg via lists.openchainproject.org <jimmy.ahlberg=ericsson.com@...> wrote:

That makes sense. Im sensitive to to many arrows and flows as there naturally will be a flow from the Local UGs back into both the WGs and the SIG. The UG is not an endpoint as I see them, but another

One thing that I believe is not as clear as previous material is the "Stream" of these facets. Perhaps the working group structure is not intended to define the interconnections, but I believe the

I think it looks great.😊 From:main@... <main@...> on behalf of Shane Coughlan <scoughlan@...> Date: Thursday, 27 October 2022 at 14:09 To: OpenChain Main <main@...> Cc: OpenChain Education

Karsten invited me to join “The Open Source Way” podcast over at SAP to explain what we do and how it impacts the supply chain and large market. Check out the recording

Steve, Mary and Jimmy… I think we made some real progress here. Thank you all for working on slide concepts. As you iterated on each other, perhaps we are emerging at a great place to describe the

Oh, very nice. I was flailing in that approximate direction, but this is much clearer and workable. steve From:main@... <main@...> on behalf of Jimmy Ahlberg via lists.openchainproject.org

Some further thinking on this. The slide layout is horrible at the moment but that can be addressed later. The main change I would propose to implement is given each of the kinds of workgroups