|
Re: REMINDER: OpenChain Bi-Weekly Work Group Call - 2021-07-13 at 06:00 UTC / 07:00 BST / 08:00 CEST / 11:30 IST / 14:00 CST / 15:00 KST+JST
Good morning Shane
Would it be possible to get recordings of these webinars? I can’t seem to be able to wake up here at 1:30 AM to attend a webinar at 2 AM Central Daylight time in the US and it
Good morning Shane
Would it be possible to get recordings of these webinars? I can’t seem to be able to wake up here at 1:30 AM to attend a webinar at 2 AM Central Daylight time in the US and it
|
By
Christopher Wood
·
#4056
·
|
|
NITA Releases Minimum Elements for a Software Bill of Materials
"Today, the Department of Commerce and NTIA are publishing a report on the minimum elements for an SBOM. The report builds on the work of NTIA’sSBOM multistakeholder process as well as the responses
"Today, the Department of Commerce and NTIA are publishing a report on the minimum elements for an SBOM. The report builds on the work of NTIA’sSBOM multistakeholder process as well as the responses
|
By
Steve Kilbane
·
#4055
·
|
|
Re: [japan-wg] REMINDER: OpenChain Bi-Weekly Work Group Call - 2021-07-13 at 06:00 UTC / 07:00 BST / 08:00 CEST / 11:30 IST / 14:00 CST / 15:00 KST+JST
We are going live now. ISO 5230 and security extensions is the topic:
https://zoom.us/j/9990120120?pwd=NzVCaFE2L1RRRFZaSkk0dm8xdlplUT09
We are going live now. ISO 5230 and security extensions is the topic:
https://zoom.us/j/9990120120?pwd=NzVCaFE2L1RRRFZaSkk0dm8xdlplUT09
|
By
Shane Coughlan
·
#4054
·
|
|
REMINDER: OpenChain Bi-Weekly Work Group Call - 2021-07-13 at 06:00 UTC / 07:00 BST / 08:00 CEST / 11:30 IST / 14:00 CST / 15:00 KST+JST
REMINDER: OpenChain Bi-Weekly Work Group Call - 2021-07-13 at 06:00 UTC / 07:00 BST / 08:00 CEST / 11:30 IST / 14:00 CST / 15:00 KST+JST
In 30 minutes we are talking OpenChain ISO 5230 and security
REMINDER: OpenChain Bi-Weekly Work Group Call - 2021-07-13 at 06:00 UTC / 07:00 BST / 08:00 CEST / 11:30 IST / 14:00 CST / 15:00 KST+JST
In 30 minutes we are talking OpenChain ISO 5230 and security
|
By
Shane Coughlan
·
#4053
·
|
|
REMINDER: OpenChain Bi-Weekly Work Group Call - 2021-07-06 at 06:00 UTC / 07:00 BST / 08:00 CEST / 11:30 IST / 14:00 CST / 15:00 KST+JST
REMINDER: OpenChain Bi-Weekly Work Group Call - 2021-07-06 at 06:00 UTC / 07:00 BST / 08:00 CEST / 11:30 IST / 14:00 CST / 15:00 KST+JST
In 30 minutes we are talking OpenChain ISO 5230 and security
REMINDER: OpenChain Bi-Weekly Work Group Call - 2021-07-06 at 06:00 UTC / 07:00 BST / 08:00 CEST / 11:30 IST / 14:00 CST / 15:00 KST+JST
In 30 minutes we are talking OpenChain ISO 5230 and security
|
By
Shane Coughlan
·
#4052
·
|
|
Webinar #26 – Open Hardware at CERN, FOSSLight Overview and Automating Yocto with SPDX
Webinar #26 – Open Hardware at CERN, FOSSLight Overview and Automating Yocto with SPDX
This was a massive webinar covering just over an hour. Highly recommended to catch the latest in open hardware
Webinar #26 – Open Hardware at CERN, FOSSLight Overview and Automating Yocto with SPDX
This was a massive webinar covering just over an hour. Highly recommended to catch the latest in open hardware
|
By
Shane Coughlan
·
#4051
·
|
|
Re: [partners] Samsung Electronics Announces OpenChain ISO 5230 Conformance
Amazing news!
Best regards,
Gilles GravierDirector, Senior Strategy Advisor - Global Open Source PracticeWipro LimitedM: +41 79 472 8437in/gillesgravier @gravax
Amazing news!
Best regards,
Gilles GravierDirector, Senior Strategy Advisor - Global Open Source PracticeWipro LimitedM: +41 79 472 8437in/gillesgravier @gravax
|
By
Gilles Gravier
·
#4050
·
|
|
Re: [partners] Samsung Electronics Announces OpenChain ISO 5230 Conformance
Spectacular news! Well done!
Andrew Katz
Partner
[LinkedIn icon]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/moorcrofts-llp> [Twitter icon] <https://twitter.com/moorcroftsllp>
[Logo] <https://moorcrofts.com/>
Spectacular news! Well done!
Andrew Katz
Partner
[LinkedIn icon]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/moorcrofts-llp> [Twitter icon] <https://twitter.com/moorcroftsllp>
[Logo] <https://moorcrofts.com/>
|
By
Andrew Katz
·
#4049
·
|
|
Samsung Electronics Announces OpenChain ISO 5230 Conformance
In one of our biggest announcements for 2021, Samsung Electronics announces adoption of OpenChain ISO 5230, the International Standard for open source compliance. They join a growing community of
In one of our biggest announcements for 2021, Samsung Electronics announces adoption of OpenChain ISO 5230, the International Standard for open source compliance. They join a growing community of
|
By
Shane Coughlan
·
#4048
·
|
|
REMINDER: OpenChain Bi-Weekly Webinar - 2021-07-06 at 06:00 UTC / 07:00 BST / 08:00 CEST / 11:30 IST / 14:00 CST / 15:00 KST+JST
OpenChain Bi-Weekly Webinar - 2021-07-06 at 06:00 UTC / 07:00 BST / 08:00 CEST / 11:30 IST / 14:00 CST / 15:00 KST+JST
On today's webinar we are going to cover two major topics.
First up we have
OpenChain Bi-Weekly Webinar - 2021-07-06 at 06:00 UTC / 07:00 BST / 08:00 CEST / 11:30 IST / 14:00 CST / 15:00 KST+JST
On today's webinar we are going to cover two major topics.
First up we have
|
By
Shane Coughlan
·
#4047
·
|
|
OpenChain Bi-Weekly Webinar - 2021-07-06 at 06:00 UTC / 07:00 BST / 08:00 CEST / 11:30 IST / 14:00 CST / 15:00 KST+JST
OpenChain Bi-Weekly Webinar - 2021-07-06 at 06:00 UTC / 07:00 BST / 08:00 CEST / 11:30 IST / 14:00 CST / 15:00 KST+JST
On tomorrow’s webinar we are going to cover two major topics.
First up we
OpenChain Bi-Weekly Webinar - 2021-07-06 at 06:00 UTC / 07:00 BST / 08:00 CEST / 11:30 IST / 14:00 CST / 15:00 KST+JST
On tomorrow’s webinar we are going to cover two major topics.
First up we
|
By
Shane Coughlan
·
#4046
·
|
|
Re: Direct or indirect supplier?
Probably just to prevent some misunderstanding or unnecessary fears:
The law, Dirk referred to, will be effective from 2023. Then it addresses companies with >3000 employees, from 2024 it will also
Probably just to prevent some misunderstanding or unnecessary fears:
The law, Dirk referred to, will be effective from 2023. Then it addresses companies with >3000 employees, from 2024 it will also
|
By
Jan Thielscher
·
#4045
·
|
|
Re: Direct or indirect supplier?
Dirk
That is a brilliant question. I would add to this that consideration of open source projects in general have many contributors. Would that make a company contributing to the code-base “that
Dirk
That is a brilliant question. I would add to this that consideration of open source projects in general have many contributors. Would that make a company contributing to the code-base “that
|
By
Christopher Wood
·
#4044
·
|
|
Re: Direct or indirect supplier?
It is also my guess that you need an explicit supply contract to establish the supplier relationship formally.
If you do it within a holding company (inner source) that formal relationship is
It is also my guess that you need an explicit supply contract to establish the supplier relationship formally.
If you do it within a holding company (inner source) that formal relationship is
|
By
Dirk Riehle
·
#4043
·
|
|
Re: Direct or indirect supplier?
By
Carlo "Kappa" Piana
·
#4042
·
|
|
Direct or indirect supplier?
Hi,
Germany has a new law about diligence in the supply chain, basically to watch out that no supplier violates human rights.
We like to talk about open source projects being suppliers, but I'm not
Hi,
Germany has a new law about diligence in the supply chain, basically to watch out that no supplier violates human rights.
We like to talk about open source projects being suppliers, but I'm not
|
By
Dirk Riehle
·
#4041
·
|
|
OpenChain Korea Work Group Meeting #10 - Full Recording
You can find all the sections of the event carefully edited by Soim right here:
https://openchain-project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/meeting/10th/
You can find all the sections of the event carefully edited by Soim right here:
https://openchain-project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/meeting/10th/
|
By
Shane Coughlan
·
#4040
·
|
|
Re: Root of competence
Hi Steve,
That’s a great question, and thinking about it, I’d be in a similar position if I was looking for formal compliance.
I’d also add “designed/wrote the Company Open Source
Hi Steve,
That’s a great question, and thinking about it, I’d be in a similar position if I was looking for formal compliance.
I’d also add “designed/wrote the Company Open Source
|
By
Martin Yagi
·
#4039
·
|
|
Re: Root of competence
Thanks, Martin. In that context, your comments make sense.
I'm specifically looking for a starting point: assuming no-one in the org has any formal/external training yet, how does one show
Thanks, Martin. In that context, your comments make sense.
I'm specifically looking for a starting point: assuming no-one in the org has any formal/external training yet, how does one show
|
By
Steve Kilbane
·
#4038
·
|
|
Re: Root of competence
Dear all,
I may have misunderstood the original question, my comment was around “training the trainers” and/or keeping the “experts” up to date. I don’t think there is much formal
Dear all,
I may have misunderstood the original question, my comment was around “training the trainers” and/or keeping the “experts” up to date. I don’t think there is much formal
|
By
Martin Yagi
·
#4037
·
|