RE [Amanda]: "I wonder if the intention is for all software to be measurable against the open chain standards or only “Open Source" please? It has always been apparent when I have worked on audits and

John et.al. Glad you mentioned that, and recently I came across the RASE (Requirement, Applicability, Selection and Exceptions) method of a Norwegian named Eilif Hjelseth with applications in building

RE: CC-BY 3.0 Should it not be updated to CC-BY 4.0? https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (BTW, Kudos to all for advancing this to v1.0, and apologies for going from active participant at the

It appears that someone in this conversation has been tagged as advocating "some ISO regime that sues people over trademark". Let me correct that. I have in the past, on this list, advocated our coope

To all, Here are interesting "Model Trademark Guidelines" for free/libre/open projects: http://modeltrademarkguidelines.org/index.php?title=Home:_Model_Trademark_Guidelines To Jeremiah, If you wish to

Jeremiah, Please see the OSI's Trademark Usage Guidelines: http://opensource.org/trademark-guidelines You might also find the OSI-vs-OSHWA tussel about logos interesting: http://www.networkworld.com/a

Jeremiah, Of course it's a bit restrictive. Isn't that the point of a certification process and certification mark? The sanctions, if necessary, would be most directly handled under normal trademark l

David, I propose the following adjustments to your entry (shown here, and also in the Etherpad) SP5.5 Use of the OpenChain logo is limited to company level designations intended for use in relation to

Mike., For and of these can selection include the intention to suggest some tweaks after voting? For example, 1 and 2 could use a bit of variation to keep them from resembling the Olympic logo. BTW, t

agreed

Also, there's no need to download anything. I created one for OpenChain just now on the Mediawiki Foundation's free hosted instance. Go to: http://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/openchain Joseph Potvin Oper

RE: "When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor t

It seems I expressed that in a manner that is misunderstood. What I was saying is that the CH Rule *is* a type of NDA, and I illustrated that with the link to Fontana's comments. I also with the two r

It seems to me that Chatham House Rules can introduce complications that reduce the level of comfort. To illustrate, look at the reference to this approach in the first paragraph of R Fontana's critiq

RE: "if we can at all convey the *possibility* of completeness" Well, that's about as deep a philosophical matter as we might get into! To briefly segway into the deep end of that pool, permit me to b

RE: "What I will say is that the vagueness of the terminology and the chart is misleading and that it is not accurate in measuring residual risk." If that's a bug report about the terminology, let's d

Items 2 and 3... 2. I've adapted a diagram that helps to visualize the role of a compliance management system in relation to reducing uncertainty and managing risk. http://wiki.opensource.org/bin/down

Hello all, In today's OpenChain call I offered the following: 1. Prepare a couple of sample License Interaction Diagrams (LIDs ...To whom to we credit that clever name??) based on appropriate UML and/

Sending my short deck about the utility of ISO/19600 heRE as back-up, as I've not previously used uberconference's presentation platform (but I'll try it there). Joseph Potvin Chair, OSI Management Ed

The new time is fine for me. Joseph Potvin Chair, OSI Management Education Working Group Coordinator, The FLOW Syllabus http://wiki.opensource.org/bin/Projects/flow-syllabus The Open Source Initiative