|
Carlo, can your team lend a hand here?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Apr 21, 2022, at 0:10, Gary O'Neall <gary@...> wrote:
Thanks Jari for creating the spreadsheet. In reviewing the spreadsheet, I realized we need to make a change to the web app before we can fix this in the questionnaire. I documented the change in the issue.
We also need some volunteers to help maintain the questionnaire JSON files. If anyone on the list is comfortable with editing JSON files, I can provide any background information.
Even if you are not comfortable editing JSON, it would be very helpful to have folks to review the JSON files to prevent issues like this from coming up in the future.
Best regards,
Gary
From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2022 3:43 AM
To: OpenChain Main <main@...>
Subject: Re: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification
Back to this old issue that seems to be still present. I created an Excel file that should have correct reference numbers now. It is uploaded to the GH issue that Gary created.
BR,
Jari
---
Jari Koivisto
E-mail: jari.p.koivisto@...
Mobile: +41 78 7479791
Skype: jari.p.koivisto
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jarikoivisto
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 9:55 AM Shane Coughlan <scoughlan@...> wrote:
Thanks Gary. I will get the fix underway :)
On Feb 4, 2022, at 13:16, Gary O'Neall <gary@...> wrote:
I added an issue in the questionnaire repo to track this: https://github.com/OpenChain-Project/conformance-questionnaire/issues/70
Gary
From: Gary O'Neall <gary@...>
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 8:07 PM
To: 'main@...' <main@...>
Subject: RE: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification
Hi Jari,
Thanks for the additional information. I don’t believe anyone is working on this issue.
The PDF is generated from the data in the conformance-questionnaire github repo.
All of the translations would need to be updated with the correct numbers.
If you or anyone on the list is comfortable with creating a pull request with the corrected numbers, I can review and merge which will automatically update the PDF.
Regards,
Gary
From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 9:36 AM
To: OpenChain Main <main@...>
Subject: Re: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification
Gary et al
So, in the Conformance in Questions (https://openchain-project.github.io/conformance-questionnaire/questionnaire.pdf), there is Spec Ref column and in that column, the references are pointing to OpenChain specification ver. 2.0. For 2.1, which is the current ISO standard, the numbering has changed.
Attached is an Excel sheet that I just put some examples of the 2.0 -> 2.1 numbering changes. As I mentioned at the moment the questionnaire uses 2.0 numbering not 2.1 and IMHO we should use the latest 2.1 specification version, which is the ISO 5230 standard.
BR,
Jari
---
Jari Koivisto
E-mail: jari.p.koivisto@...
Mobile: +41 78 7479791
Skype: jari.p.koivisto
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jarikoivisto
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:09 PM Gary O'Neall <gary@...> wrote:
Hi Jari,
Can you provide more specifics on where the inconsistency is? I just looked at the PDF in the link below it has the following text in the header:
This document contains a series of questions to determine whether a company has an OpenChain Conformant program. If each of these questions can be answered with a "yes" then that company meets all the requirements of conformance to the OpenChain Specification version 2.1 (functionally identical to ISO/IEC DIS 5230:2020(e)). If any of the questions are answered with a "no" then the company can clearly identify where additional investment is needed to improve the compliance process.
It could be an issue in one of the translations if you are looking at a language other than English.
Thanks,
Gary
From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 2:33 AM
To: OpenChain Main <main@...>
Subject: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification
Hi All,
I just noticed that the printable version of self-certification document (https://openchain-project.github.io/conformance-questionnaire/questionnaire.pdf) has Spec Refs to the OpenChain Spec 2.0 version and not the latest 2.1 (ISO 5230) version.
Is someone working on this already?
BR,
Jari
---
Jari Koivisto
E-mail: jari.p.koivisto@...
Mobile: +41 78 7479791
Skype: jari.p.koivisto
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jarikoivisto
|
|
|
Thanks Jari for creating the spreadsheet. In reviewing the spreadsheet, I realized we need to make a change to the web app before we can fix this in the questionnaire. I documented the change in the issue. We also need some volunteers to help maintain the questionnaire JSON files. If anyone on the list is comfortable with editing JSON files, I can provide any background information. Even if you are not comfortable editing JSON, it would be very helpful to have folks to review the JSON files to prevent issues like this from coming up in the future. Best regards, Gary
From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2022 3:43 AM To: OpenChain Main <main@...> Subject: Re: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification Back to this old issue that seems to be still present. I created an Excel file that should have correct reference numbers now. It is uploaded to the GH issue that Gary created. On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 9:55 AM Shane Coughlan <scoughlan@...> wrote: Thanks Gary. I will get the fix underway :)
> On Feb 4, 2022, at 13:16, Gary O'Neall <gary@...> wrote:
>
> I added an issue in the questionnaire repo to track this: https://github.com/OpenChain-Project/conformance-questionnaire/issues/70
>
>
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> From: Gary O'Neall <gary@...>
> Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 8:07 PM
> To: 'main@...' <main@...>
> Subject: RE: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification
>
>
>
> Hi Jari,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the additional information. I don’t believe anyone is working on this issue.
>
>
>
> The PDF is generated from the data in the conformance-questionnaire github repo.
>
>
>
> All of the translations would need to be updated with the correct numbers.
>
>
>
> If you or anyone on the list is comfortable with creating a pull request with the corrected numbers, I can review and merge which will automatically update the PDF.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto
> Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 9:36 AM
> To: OpenChain Main <main@...>
> Subject: Re: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification
>
>
>
> Gary et al
>
>
>
>
>
> So, in the Conformance in Questions (https://openchain-project.github.io/conformance-questionnaire/questionnaire.pdf), there is Spec Ref column and in that column, the references are pointing to OpenChain specification ver. 2.0. For 2.1, which is the current ISO standard, the numbering has changed.
>
>
>
> Attached is an Excel sheet that I just put some examples of the 2.0 -> 2.1 numbering changes. As I mentioned at the moment the questionnaire uses 2.0 numbering not 2.1 and IMHO we should use the latest 2.1 specification version, which is the ISO 5230 standard.
>
>
>
> BR,
>
>
>
> Jari
>
>
> ---
> Jari Koivisto
> E-mail: jari.p.koivisto@...
> Mobile: +41 78 7479791
> Skype: jari.p.koivisto
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jarikoivisto
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:09 PM Gary O'Neall <gary@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Jari,
>
>
>
> Can you provide more specifics on where the inconsistency is? I just looked at the PDF in the link below it has the following text in the header:
>
>
>
> This document contains a series of questions to determine whether a company has an OpenChain Conformant program. If each of these questions can be answered with a "yes" then that company meets all the requirements of conformance to the OpenChain Specification version 2.1 (functionally identical to ISO/IEC DIS 5230:2020(e)). If any of the questions are answered with a "no" then the company can clearly identify where additional investment is needed to improve the compliance process.
>
>
>
> It could be an issue in one of the translations if you are looking at a language other than English.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto
> Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 2:33 AM
> To: OpenChain Main <main@...>
> Subject: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I just noticed that the printable version of self-certification document (https://openchain-project.github.io/conformance-questionnaire/questionnaire.pdf) has Spec Refs to the OpenChain Spec 2.0 version and not the latest 2.1 (ISO 5230) version.
>
>
>
> Is someone working on this already?
>
>
>
> BR,
>
>
>
> Jari
>
>
> ---
> Jari Koivisto
> E-mail: jari.p.koivisto@...
> Mobile: +41 78 7479791
> Skype: jari.p.koivisto
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jarikoivisto
>
>
>
|
|
|
Back to this old issue that seems to be still present. I created an Excel file that should have correct reference numbers now. It is uploaded to the GH issue that Gary created.
BR,
Jari
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 9:55 AM Shane Coughlan < scoughlan@...> wrote: Thanks Gary. I will get the fix underway :)
> On Feb 4, 2022, at 13:16, Gary O'Neall <gary@...> wrote:
>
> I added an issue in the questionnaire repo to track this: https://github.com/OpenChain-Project/conformance-questionnaire/issues/70
>
>
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> From: Gary O'Neall <gary@...>
> Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 8:07 PM
> To: 'main@...' <main@...>
> Subject: RE: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification
>
>
>
> Hi Jari,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the additional information. I don’t believe anyone is working on this issue.
>
>
>
> The PDF is generated from the data in the conformance-questionnaire github repo.
>
>
>
> All of the translations would need to be updated with the correct numbers.
>
>
>
> If you or anyone on the list is comfortable with creating a pull request with the corrected numbers, I can review and merge which will automatically update the PDF.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto
> Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 9:36 AM
> To: OpenChain Main <main@...>
> Subject: Re: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification
>
>
>
> Gary et al
>
>
>
>
>
> So, in the Conformance in Questions (https://openchain-project.github.io/conformance-questionnaire/questionnaire.pdf), there is Spec Ref column and in that column, the references are pointing to OpenChain specification ver. 2.0. For 2.1, which is the current ISO standard, the numbering has changed.
>
>
>
> Attached is an Excel sheet that I just put some examples of the 2.0 -> 2.1 numbering changes. As I mentioned at the moment the questionnaire uses 2.0 numbering not 2.1 and IMHO we should use the latest 2.1 specification version, which is the ISO 5230 standard.
>
>
>
> BR,
>
>
>
> Jari
>
>
> ---
> Jari Koivisto
> E-mail: jari.p.koivisto@...
> Mobile: +41 78 7479791
> Skype: jari.p.koivisto
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jarikoivisto
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:09 PM Gary O'Neall <gary@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Jari,
>
>
>
> Can you provide more specifics on where the inconsistency is? I just looked at the PDF in the link below it has the following text in the header:
>
>
>
> This document contains a series of questions to determine whether a company has an OpenChain Conformant program. If each of these questions can be answered with a "yes" then that company meets all the requirements of conformance to the OpenChain Specification version 2.1 (functionally identical to ISO/IEC DIS 5230:2020(e)). If any of the questions are answered with a "no" then the company can clearly identify where additional investment is needed to improve the compliance process.
>
>
>
> It could be an issue in one of the translations if you are looking at a language other than English.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto
> Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 2:33 AM
> To: OpenChain Main <main@...>
> Subject: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I just noticed that the printable version of self-certification document (https://openchain-project.github.io/conformance-questionnaire/questionnaire.pdf) has Spec Refs to the OpenChain Spec 2.0 version and not the latest 2.1 (ISO 5230) version.
>
>
>
> Is someone working on this already?
>
>
>
> BR,
>
>
>
> Jari
>
>
> ---
> Jari Koivisto
> E-mail: jari.p.koivisto@...
> Mobile: +41 78 7479791
> Skype: jari.p.koivisto
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jarikoivisto
>
>
>
|
|
|
Thanks Gary. I will get the fix underway :)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Feb 4, 2022, at 13:16, Gary O'Neall <gary@...> wrote:
I added an issue in the questionnaire repo to track this: https://github.com/OpenChain-Project/conformance-questionnaire/issues/70
Gary
From: Gary O'Neall <gary@...>
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 8:07 PM
To: 'main@...' <main@...>
Subject: RE: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification
Hi Jari,
Thanks for the additional information. I don’t believe anyone is working on this issue.
The PDF is generated from the data in the conformance-questionnaire github repo.
All of the translations would need to be updated with the correct numbers.
If you or anyone on the list is comfortable with creating a pull request with the corrected numbers, I can review and merge which will automatically update the PDF.
Regards,
Gary
From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 9:36 AM
To: OpenChain Main <main@...>
Subject: Re: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification
Gary et al
So, in the Conformance in Questions (https://openchain-project.github.io/conformance-questionnaire/questionnaire.pdf), there is Spec Ref column and in that column, the references are pointing to OpenChain specification ver. 2.0. For 2.1, which is the current ISO standard, the numbering has changed.
Attached is an Excel sheet that I just put some examples of the 2.0 -> 2.1 numbering changes. As I mentioned at the moment the questionnaire uses 2.0 numbering not 2.1 and IMHO we should use the latest 2.1 specification version, which is the ISO 5230 standard.
BR,
Jari
---
Jari Koivisto
E-mail: jari.p.koivisto@...
Mobile: +41 78 7479791
Skype: jari.p.koivisto
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jarikoivisto
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:09 PM Gary O'Neall <gary@...> wrote:
Hi Jari,
Can you provide more specifics on where the inconsistency is? I just looked at the PDF in the link below it has the following text in the header:
This document contains a series of questions to determine whether a company has an OpenChain Conformant program. If each of these questions can be answered with a "yes" then that company meets all the requirements of conformance to the OpenChain Specification version 2.1 (functionally identical to ISO/IEC DIS 5230:2020(e)). If any of the questions are answered with a "no" then the company can clearly identify where additional investment is needed to improve the compliance process.
It could be an issue in one of the translations if you are looking at a language other than English.
Thanks,
Gary
From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 2:33 AM
To: OpenChain Main <main@...>
Subject: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification
Hi All,
I just noticed that the printable version of self-certification document (https://openchain-project.github.io/conformance-questionnaire/questionnaire.pdf) has Spec Refs to the OpenChain Spec 2.0 version and not the latest 2.1 (ISO 5230) version.
Is someone working on this already?
BR,
Jari
---
Jari Koivisto
E-mail: jari.p.koivisto@...
Mobile: +41 78 7479791
Skype: jari.p.koivisto
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jarikoivisto
|
|
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: Gary O'Neall <gary@...> Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 8:07 PM To: 'main@...' <main@...> Subject: RE: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification Hi Jari, Thanks for the additional information. I don’t believe anyone is working on this issue. The PDF is generated from the data in the conformance-questionnaire github repo. All of the translations would need to be updated with the correct numbers. If you or anyone on the list is comfortable with creating a pull request with the corrected numbers, I can review and merge which will automatically update the PDF. Regards,
Gary From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 9:36 AM
To: OpenChain Main <main@...>
Subject: Re: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification Gary et al Attached is an Excel sheet that I just put some examples of the 2.0 -> 2.1 numbering changes. As I mentioned at the moment the questionnaire uses 2.0 numbering not 2.1 and IMHO we should use the latest 2.1 specification version, which is the ISO 5230 standard. On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:09 PM Gary O'Neall <gary@...> wrote: Hi Jari, Can you provide more specifics on where the inconsistency is? I just looked at the PDF in the link below it has the following text in the header: This document contains a series of questions to determine whether a company has an OpenChain Conformant program. If each of these questions can be answered with a "yes" then that company meets all the requirements of conformance to the OpenChain Specification version 2.1 (functionally identical to ISO/IEC DIS 5230:2020(e)). If any of the questions are answered with a "no" then the company can clearly identify where additional investment is needed to improve the compliance process. It could be an issue in one of the translations if you are looking at a language other than English. Thanks, Gary From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 2:33 AM
To: OpenChain Main <main@...>
Subject: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification Hi All, Is someone working on this already?
|
|
|
Hi Jari, Thanks for the additional information. I don’t believe anyone is working on this issue. The PDF is generated from the data in the conformance-questionnaire github repo. All of the translations would need to be updated with the correct numbers. If you or anyone on the list is comfortable with creating a pull request with the corrected numbers, I can review and merge which will automatically update the PDF. Regards,
Gary
From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 9:36 AM To: OpenChain Main <main@...> Subject: Re: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification Gary et al Attached is an Excel sheet that I just put some examples of the 2.0 -> 2.1 numbering changes. As I mentioned at the moment the questionnaire uses 2.0 numbering not 2.1 and IMHO we should use the latest 2.1 specification version, which is the ISO 5230 standard. On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:09 PM Gary O'Neall <gary@...> wrote: Hi Jari, Can you provide more specifics on where the inconsistency is? I just looked at the PDF in the link below it has the following text in the header: This document contains a series of questions to determine whether a company has an OpenChain Conformant program. If each of these questions can be answered with a "yes" then that company meets all the requirements of conformance to the OpenChain Specification version 2.1 (functionally identical to ISO/IEC DIS 5230:2020(e)). If any of the questions are answered with a "no" then the company can clearly identify where additional investment is needed to improve the compliance process. It could be an issue in one of the translations if you are looking at a language other than English. Thanks, Gary From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 2:33 AM
To: OpenChain Main <main@...>
Subject: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification Hi All, Is someone working on this already?
|
|
|
Gary et al
Attached is an Excel sheet that I just put some examples of the 2.0 -> 2.1 numbering changes. As I mentioned at the moment the questionnaire uses 2.0 numbering not 2.1 and IMHO we should use the latest 2.1 specification version, which is the ISO 5230 standard.
BR,
Jari
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:09 PM Gary O'Neall < gary@...> wrote: Hi Jari, Can you provide more specifics on where the inconsistency is? I just looked at the PDF in the link below it has the following text in the header: This document contains a series of questions to determine whether a company has an OpenChain Conformant program. If each of these questions can be answered with a "yes" then that company meets all the requirements of conformance to the OpenChain Specification version 2.1 (functionally identical to ISO/IEC DIS 5230:2020(e)). If any of the questions are answered with a "no" then the company can clearly identify where additional investment is needed to improve the compliance process. It could be an issue in one of the translations if you are looking at a language other than English. Thanks, Gary From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 2:33 AM
To: OpenChain Main <main@...>
Subject: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification Hi All, Is someone working on this already?
|
|
|
Hi Jari, Can you provide more specifics on where the inconsistency is? I just looked at the PDF in the link below it has the following text in the header: This document contains a series of questions to determine whether a company has an OpenChain Conformant program. If each of these questions can be answered with a "yes" then that company meets all the requirements of conformance to the OpenChain Specification version 2.1 (functionally identical to ISO/IEC DIS 5230:2020(e)). If any of the questions are answered with a "no" then the company can clearly identify where additional investment is needed to improve the compliance process. It could be an issue in one of the translations if you are looking at a language other than English. Thanks, Gary
From: main@... <main@...> On Behalf Of Jari Koivisto Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 2:33 AM To: OpenChain Main <main@...> Subject: [openchain] OpenChain Self Certification Hi All, Is someone working on this already?
|
|
|
Hi All,
Is someone working on this already?
BR,
Jari
|
|
|
